Princess Sophie of Prussia’s Trousseau (Part I)

Princess Sophie of Prussia (1870-1932) married Crown Prince Constantine of Greece (1868-1923) amid great pomp and splendour in Athens in 1889. Her wedding dress of imitation Venetian lace and silver brocade, which I discussed in my previous post, and her trousseau were worthy of a future Queen of the Hellenes, if the accounts in the German and English newspapers of the day are reliable.

Figure 1.1. Artist unknown, The Royal Party Opening the State Ball at the Royal Palace: The Festivities at Athens in Honour of the Greek Royal Wedding, Graphic (London), November 16, 1889, 612, source: Newspapers.com. The couples, from front to back: Princess Sophie of Prussia and Prince Henry of Prussia, the Princess of Wales and Crown Prince Constantine of Greece, the Queen of Denmark and the King of Greece, the German Empress and the King of Denmark, the Queen of Greece and the German Emperor.

At the time, well-bred brides took everything they could conceivably require to their new home in their trousseau, which included dresses, hats, coats, mantles, shawls, linen (a broad term that covered underwear, nightgowns, handkerchiefs, bed linen and table linen), jewellery and silverware. Princess Sophie’s trousseau was no exception, but it probably eclipsed that of most brides in terms of quantity, filling about 200 trunks.1 Lace had pride of place, encompassing various lace-making techniques; it was supplemented by a set of Honiton lace, a gift from Queen Victoria, Sophie’s grandmother,2 who actively patronized the British lace industry and encouraged the use of Honiton lace at weddings within her own family. Contemporary newspapers remain tantalizingly silent about the cost of this vast trousseau, with the exception of the Standard, which, however, gives only the value of the linen and two Indian shawls (yet another wedding present from Queen Victoria): 25,000 marks and 12,000 marks, respectively.3 Most of the trousseau was supplied by Berlin and Frankfurt firms, and reports in German newspapers and the Queen, The Lady’s Newspaper, a London magazine, even identify the purveyors of Sophie’s lingerie. However, the names of fashion houses that provided her with evening and court dresses, daywear and coats are omitted, probably to prevent the dissemination of copies of the designs, thus sparing Sophie the chagrin that would have inevitably resulted from the knowledge that other women were wearing outfits that resembled her own.

Unfortunately, the reporters of the time also refrain from mentioning the quantity of the various items that Sophie would take with her to Greece. Articles speak glowingly about the sheer amplitude of her lingerie and its craftsmanship, for example, but say nothing about the number of undervests,4 camisoles,5 nightgowns, stockings and so forth that she had ordered. On the other hand, the Standard tells of five toques and “eleven arrangements of flowers and feathers” to be worn as hair ornaments.6 By this account, it would seem that Sophie did not have many hats, but it is likely that only these lavishly decorated toques, which, in the German and Greek popular imagination, would have been appropriately ostentatious headgear for a future queen, were selected for display in the public exhibition of her trousseau.

The trousseau itself was not preserved for posterity and verifiable images of the garments do not exist, making a study of its individual elements impossible (especially in the absence of an inventory detailing names of vendors, amounts paid, number of items ordered, etc.). Nonetheless, primary sources in the form of the afore-mentioned periodicals offer an overview of what such a collection might have looked like. My discussion of the trousseau, which is divided into three posts, is also informed by 1889 issues of Der Bazar, a prominent women’s fashion magazine published in Berlin that Sophie herself might have consulted while assembling her bridal wardrobe. This post (Part I) deals with the bride’s lingerie and the clothes she would wear in the intimacy of her marital home, as well as the fine and valuable laces she would use to decorate her gowns, while her day dresses, outerwear, hats and hair ornaments form the focus of Part II. Finally, Part III takes evening dresses, court clothing and jewellery as its subject.

Lace

The highlight of Princess Sophie’s lace, and the focus of much praise in the newspapers, was a flounce of white point de Venise, made by the Berlin lace manufacturer B. Wechselmann.7 It was thirty-five centimetres in height and had a pattern of intertwining myrtles and roses with appliquéd flowers; narrow laces displaying the same design served as an accompaniment.8 There was also a black flounce of Chantilly lace with floral designs that exceeded one metre in height and had narrow pieces of matching lace, as well as coordinating barbes and fans.9 Chantilly lace obtained its name from a town in north-east France that produced black continuous bobbin laces in the second half of the eighteenth century; the lace owed its dainty appearance to the use of half stitch, as opposed to whole stitch, for creating naturalistic floral motifs.10

Such laces could be conveniently tacked onto an evening gown, removed afterwards and stored for future use; thus, the wearer could utilize the same pieces of lace throughout the course of her life to change the look of different garments. While Sophie could have used either of the above-mentioned large flounces to embellish a skirt, the narrow laces from the same set could have appeared as trimming on the bodice’s neckline and sleeve cuffs. The long Chantilly lace flounce, which would probably have reached from the wearer’s waist to her feet, was versatile enough to be styled in two different ways: that is, asymmetrically draped over the skirt front, so that it would be visible through the opening in the overskirt, like the swathe of lace in figure 1.2, or hanging straight in folds, as in figure 1.3.

Figure 1.2. Artist unknown, Nr. 42. Evening dress in silk reps, damask and lace, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, October 14, 1889, 403, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.3. Artist unknown, Nr. 37. Evening toilette in plush, made by J. A. Heese, Berlin, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, November 11, 1889, 440, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.

Lingerie and home-wear

The firms of F. V. Grünfeld in Silesia and Jules Bister in Berlin, as well as Edmonds, Orr and Co. in London, supplied the lingerie portion of Princess Sophie’s trousseau.11 All of her linen, including the table linen, was embroidered with her monogram, an “S” surmounted by a crown.12

Sophie’s lingerie was undeniably elegant and luxurious, thanks to the use of Valenciennes lace for embellishing her underwear, in the form of chemises, undervests (some of which were also threaded with ribbon) and camisoles, and her handkerchiefs of French lawn.13 Although originally a Flemish town, Valenciennes capitulated to Louis XIV (1638-1715) in 1678, and its speciality, a continuous bobbin lace “with a broad but light and ethereal design,… with a minute line of holes pricked evenly around each motif, made of 1,200-count thread and produced therefore with a cosmic slowness,” became a French lace.14 The production of Valenciennes lace eventually moved to other centres in France, as well as Belgium, which fashioned it as a sturdy lace for the undergarments of Queen Victoria, Empress Eugénie and other customers.15

Sophie must have been one of the few women who could pack her trousseau trunks with underwear trimmed with costly Valenciennes lace. Der Bazar, while giving a round-up of lingerie trends in an August 1889 issue, emphasizes the sheer range of expensive Valenciennes-ornamented chemises and predicts their popularity amongst customers:

Hemden… mit Valenciennespitze ausgestattet und mit farbigem Band durchzogen, ganz allerliebst aus… und dürften manche Liebhaberin finden, wenn unsere Damen hören, dass von dieser Sorte durchaus keine Dutzendzahl bedingt ist. Man rechnet sie, eben weil die Sache etwas ungewöhnlich ist, zu den über den Etat greifenden Luxusartikeln.

Shifts… decorated with Valenciennes lace and with coloured ribbon running through them, look absolutely lovely… and are sure to find many a fan when our ladies hear that there are certainly not just a dozen of this type. Precisely because the item is somewhat exceptional, it is counted as an over-budget luxury article.16

Figure 1.3. Artist unknown, Nr. 25. Underbodice or camisole, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, 336, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.4. Artist unknown, Nr. 26. Corset cover or camisole, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, 337, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.5. Artist unknown, Nr. 28. Ladies’ undervest. Knitting and crochet, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, October 1, 1889, 383, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.

An article that appeared in the Neues Tagblatt after the wedding, while gushing over Sophie’s sophisticated taste in underwear and sleepwear, outlines the ways these items combined Valenciennes lace with a variety of other textiles and different types of embroidery:

Was die Wäsche betrifft, so hat die Prinzessin selbst überall die Wahl getroffen und Stoffe, Spitzen, Festons, Stickereien, Durchbruchmuster nach eigener Angabe konfektionieren lassen. Die Leibwäsche ist aus feinstem Grasleinen, teilweise auch aus echter Brussa-seide gefertigt. Man sieht da nicht die überladene Pracht, die sich oft bei Ausstattungen reicher bürgerlicher geltend macht; alles einfach, stilvoll, kunstgerecht. Tag- und Nachthemden sind in Form von Devants Bräute sehr geschmackvoll mit Valenciennes und Handstickereien garniert; vielfach ist Handarbeit statt der Maschinen-stepperei mit besonderer Feinheit und Accuratesse ver-wendet. Die seidenen Hemden fallen vorteilhaft durch ihre Einfachheit auf. Der Rumpf ist ganz glatt, vorn nur eine Passe mit farbiger Festonstickerei, oben gleicher Bund.

As far as the lingerie is concerned, the princess herself made the choice throughout and had fabrics, lace, festoon borders, embroidery and openwork patterns made according to her own specifications. The underwear is made from the finest grass linen, in some cases also from real Brussa silk. One does not see the excessive splendour that often appears in the outfits of rich bourgeois brides; everything simple, stylish, artistic. The fronts of chemises and nightgowns are very tastefully decorated with Valenciennes and hand embroidery; in many cases, needlework is used instead of machine stitching with particular delicacy and accuracy. The silk shifts stand out thanks to their simplicity. The body is completely plain, only a yoke with coloured festoon embroidery at the front, a similar band at the top.17

As the preceding description indicates, a skillful, though sparing, use of coloured embroidery in Sophie’s linen provided visual interest to undergarments and accessories that were predominantly white, in keeping with the fashion of the time.

Figure 1.6. An example of openwork. Artist unknown, Nr. 24. Decorative border for linen items. Whitework or broderie anglaise, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, 337, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.7. Artist unknown, Nr. 48. Linen chemise or shift, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, 337, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.8. Coloured herringbone stitches and trimmings of serrated bands on a white ground. Artist unknown, Nr. 45. Nightgown, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, 336, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.

The use of coloured embellishment on underwear was atypical, but Der Bazar strongly encourages it:

Zum Sticken der Leibwäsche wählt man, wie auch zum Zeichnen des übrigen Wäschebestandes, gern weißes Garn, wenn auch etwas farbiger Zierrat an der Wäsche durchaus nicht ausgeschlossen ist. So z. B. sehen Nachthemden mit einer Garnitur aus farbigen Languettenstreifen und farbigen Fischgrätenstichen, wie solches Abb. Nr. 45 zeigt, ganz allerliebst aus;

For embroidering the underwear, as for the design of other linens, white thread is often chosen, although some coloured decoration on the lingerie is not out of the question. For example, nightgowns look very lovely with a trimming of coloured bands of languettes and coloured herringbone stitches, as shown in illustration Nr. 45 [figure 1.8];18

Languettes, which had a serrated or scalloped edge, were widely used in the lingerie industry—those found on flannel, crepe and worsted-flannel petticoats were embroidered with white or coloured silk—but also featured on garments themselves, such as white promenade skirts.19 In a possible nod to Der Bazar’s recommendation, Princess Sophie included white silk nightgowns with trimmings of coloured languettes, the creation of the firm of Jules Bister,20 in her trousseau.

Her lingerie also incorporated coloured fabrics as decoration; moreover, the nightgowns, consisting of assorted textiles, demonstrated a range of sewing and decoration techniques, designs and styles. As the Standard informs its readers: “Those of the night-gowns which are not of silk are of the finest chamboie, and trimmed partly with lace-jabots, partly with diagonal embroidered insertions, the effect of which is enhanced by coloured lawn under them. There are some also with little crush-folds and broad, turned-down collars.”21

To the already-existing diversity of fabrics—German linen,22 grass linen, silks, chamboie—Edmonds, Orr and Co., a supplier to the British Royal family, contributed items made of Lisle thread, such as camisoles, some of which were also in silk, and stockings.23 These latter were in addition to those made of spun silk, silk and wool; the stockings matched Sophie’s dresses, while others were in black and white and were plain or featured openwork and embroidery.24

Spencer bodices, which, unlike the Princess’s daintily trimmed camisoles, were designed to keep the wearer warm,25 were also included in her trousseau for her to wear when she went riding.26

Figure 1.9. A matinée was a jacket of thin, lightweight fabric that could be worn outdoors. Artist unknown, Nr. 45. Flannel matinée, made by Jules Bister, Berlin, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, April 15, 1889, 145, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.10. Artist unknown, Nr. 69. Morning dress or house dress, made by J. A. Heese, Berlin, Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, November 11, 1889, 444, source: Universitäts-und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf.
Figure 1.11. Artist unknown, N. 38. Dressing gown with Greek sleeves, Tygodnik mód i Powieści: Z dodatkiem illustrowanym ubrań i robót kobiecych, April 1 (13), 1889, source: University of Warsaw Library.

Fashion houses presented Sophie with various options in response to her need for comfortable, informal clothing that she could wear in the privacy of her home. In addition to lingerie, Jules Bister made morning dresses of white wool, with white satin embellishment, for her to don after bathing.27 Embroidery and trimmings of white cambric adorned morning jackets;28 and a pink matinée, or jacket, from the atelier of Gerion and Co., Berlin, was decorated all round with Valenciennes lace.29

From the same firm came a cream-coloured Robe intérieure with a sash-like ribbon, whose long ends dangled in front, based on a model designed especially for Sophie; Alençon insertions and lace embellished the garment’s wide Greek sleeves.30 The use of this outfit, or dressing-gown, would have been restricted to the bedroom;31 as figure 1.11 indicates, there was a vogue for dressing-gowns with sweeping Greek sleeves in 1889. Alençon, which emerged from a town of the same name in Normandy during the early 1700s, was a needlepoint lace made with buttonhole stitches, whose cordonnet (a raised cord outlining the design), unlike that of other laces, had horsehair for its foundation.32

Coming up next: Part II.

Notes

1. “Foreign News of the Week. The Royal Wedding,” Birmingham Weekly Post, November 2, 1889.

2. “The Greek Royal Wedding. The German Emperor’s Reception,” Standard (London), October 28, 1889. Pat Earnshaw, A Dictionary of Lace (Princes Risborough: Shire Publications, 1982), Internet Archive, describes Honiton lace, which took its name from a town in East Devon that had been known for lace production since the seventeenth century, as a “non-continuous bobbin lace of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries” with “typical fillings such as diamond, toad in the hole, blossom, and swing and a pin; and typical design units called bullock’s hearts, turkey tails, Devon rose, pear border, beetle-head sprigs and orange blossom” (80). Bobbin lace (or pillow lace) was the outcome of a “modified weaving process which takes its name from the way it is made – with bobbins, usually of bone or wood, on a pillow or cushion… [in] non-continuous [bobbin lace]… the closed sprigs or motifs are made as one operation and the linking of them by brides or by mesh as another” (18-19).

3. “Greek Royal Wedding.” In 1889, 25,000 marks would have equated to around 202,500 euros or $219,186 in 2023 money, whereas 12,000 marks would have been the equivalent of approximately 97,200 euros or $105,209 in 2023. For the marks to euros conversion rate, see “Purchasing Power Equivalents of Historical Amounts in German Currencies,” Deutsche Bundesbank, last updated January 2024, https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/622372/d64726452d1eb2f62ce667f6784f89bb/mL/kaufkraftaequivalente-historischer-betraege-in-deutschen-waehrungen-data.pdf. “Foreign News” reports that Sophie’s linen cost more than £1,000, while “The Royal Wedding at Athens. A Great Function,” Derby Mercury, October 30, 1889, reveals that the two Indian shawls gifted by Queen Victoria cost £600. These amounts would equate to about $169,062 and $101,437, respectively, in 2023 figures, according to Eric W. Nye, Pounds Sterling to Dollars: Historical Conversion of Currency, accessed March 20, 2024, https://www.uwyo.edu/numimage/currency.htm.

4. The undervest, an item in use since the c. 1840s and worn by both men and women, was an “under-garment, on the hygienic principle of “wool next the skin,”… usually of merino, thigh-length and sleeved;… from 1875 ladies adopted coloured vests of washable silk and gussets shaped for the breasts were then introduced.” C. Willett Cunnington, Phillis Cunnington, and Charles Beard, A Dictionary of English Costume (London: Adam & Charles Black, 1976), 225, Internet Archive.

5. A camisole was: “A short-sleeved or sleeveless under-bodice of white long-cloth, worn over the stays to protect the tight-fitting dress.” Ibid, 35.

6. “Greek Royal Wedding.”

7. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt,” Hallesches Tageblatt (Halle), October 12, 1889, https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/newspaper/item/OEGVST23C22XNLZYEPN2EB2YHXZPABSY?issuepage=3. See Faiza Mahmud, “Princess Sophie of Prussia’s Wedding Ensemble,” Lost and Found blog, January 31, 2024, https://dressingroyalty.wordpress.com/2024/01/31/princess-sophie-of-prussias-wedding-ensemble/, for my discussion of point de Venise.

8. “Greek Royal Wedding;” “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.”

9. “Greek Royal Wedding.” The Oxford English Dictionary, while indicating that the term “barbe” first came into use in around 1374, defines it as, “Part of a woman’s head-dress, still sometimes worn by nuns, consisting of a piece of white plaited linen, passed over or under the chin, and reaching midway to the waist.” In other words, a barbe could be a headscarf or kerchief. On the other hand, Earnshaw, Dictionary of Lace, points out that barbes were synonymous with lappets, a pair of lace streamers “attached to the back of the head and obligatory for court wear from c 1660 to well into the nineteenth century” (97). “Aus der Reichshauptstadt” mentions “Barben und Tücher,” which translates as barbes and shawls, but makes no reference to fans.

10. Earnshaw, Dictionary of Lace, 31, 77. Continuous bobbin laces, the opposite of the “non-continuous” variety, were “worked straight across between footing and heading, the ground and the denser parts in one” (35). In bobbin laces, whole stitch and half stitch were “two main stitches used to make the solid parts of the design… Whole stitch is more closely worked and gives the appearance of woven linen. Half stitch is more open, looking like a grill of intersecting stars” (77).

11. Ida Barber, “Feuilleton. Die Ausstattung der Prinzessin Sophie von Preußen,” Neues Tagblatt (Stuttgart), November 1, 1889, https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/newspaper/item/X5UUUH5EZWMYWNEFHW63WHF56U26QXRC?issuepage=2;” “A Royal Trousseau,” Queen, The Lady’s Newspaper, May 18, 1889, 688.

12. “Greek Royal Wedding;” Barber, “Feuilleton.”

13. Barber, “Feuilleton;” “Royal Trousseau,” 688; “Greek Royal Wedding.”

14. Earnshaw, Dictionary of Lace, 177.

15. Ibid.

16. “Über Leib- und Hauswäsche,” Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung, August 26, 1889, cover page, https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ihd/periodical/pageview/2996244.

17. Barber, “Feuilleton.” The Oxford English Dictionary defines openwork as, “Metalwork, needlework, etc., having decorative or ornamental openings,” and has the following entry for grass linen: “A fine, light linen-like cloth originally made in China and plain woven from ramie or other strong plant fibres.” Brussa silk came from Bursa (Turkey), which, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica, was also known as Brusa or Prusa and enjoyed an international reputation for its silk production.

18. “Über Leib- und Hauswäsche,” cover page. Cunnington, Cunnington and Beard, Dictionary of English Costume, claim that the use of the languette was prevalent during c. 1818-22, identifying it as, “A flat, tongue-shaped, applied trimming, a common decoration for skirts and pelisses” (124).

19. “Über Leib- und Hauswäsche,” cover page.

20. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.”

21. “Greek Royal Wedding.” It is unclear what sort of textile “chamboie” might refer to.

22. Ibid.

23. “Royal Trousseau,” 688. Harry P. Curtis, Glossary of Textile Terms (Manchester: Marsden, 1921), Google Play, describes Lisle thread as, “Yarns made from the finest of long staple cotton” (164). These are “passed over a gas flame to burn off any fiber ends;” Lisle is, moreover, “the smoothest, most lustrous cotton knit possible (closest to fine linen knit); it is used for… stockings for those… who… want something sturdier than silk!” notes Mary Humphries, Fabric Glossary (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996), Internet Archive, 131.

24. “Royal Trousseau,” 688.

25. The spencer bodice made for Princess Sophie may have been the same as the late-nineteenth century “flannel or knitted sleeveless spencer… worn under the jacket for extra warmth by the elderly or infirm” mentioned in Cunnington, Cunnington and Beard, Dictionary of English Costume, 202.

26. “Royal Trousseau,” 688.

27. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.”

28. “Greek Royal Wedding.”

29. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.” According to the Oxford English Dictionary, a matinée was, “A woman’s lingerie jacket or wrap for morning wear.” Cunnington, Cunnington and Beard, Dictionary of English Costume explain that it was, “A hooded pardessus made of jacconet or muslin and worn outdoors over a morning dress” (134); a pardessus was any outdoor garment of half or 3/4 length, with sleeves and shaped into the waist” (156).

30. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.” Cunnington, Cunnington and Beard, Dictionary of English Costume, refer to the Greek sleeve as a “Grecian sleeve,” describing it as, “An undersleeve slit open at the side and closed with buttons” (98).

31. Cunnington, Cunnington and Beard, Dictionary of English Costume, 69.

32. Earnshaw, Dictionary of Lace, 3-4; Emily Leigh Lowes, Chats on Old Lace and Needlework (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908), 41, 73, 77, https://archive.org/details/cu31924052083924/page/n115/mode/2up?view=theater.

Bibliography

Barber, Ida. “Feuilleton. Die Ausstattung der Prinzessin Sophie von Preußen.” Neues Tagblatt (Stuttgart), November 1, 1889. https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/newspaper/item/X5UUUH5EZWMYWNEFHW63WHF56U26QXRC?issuepage=2.

Der Bazar. Illustrirte Damen-Zeitung. “Über Leib- und Hauswäsche.” August 26, 1889. https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ihd/periodical/pageview/2996244.

Cunnington, C. Willett, Phillis Cunnington, and Charles Beard. A Dictionary of English Costume. London: Adam & Charles Black, 1976. Internet Archive.

Curtis, Harry P. Glossary of Textile Terms. Manchester: Marsden, 1921. Google Play.

Earnshaw, Pat. A Dictionary of Lace. Princes Risborough: Shire Publications, 1982. Internet Archive.

Hallesches Tageblatt. “Aus der Reichshauptstadt.” October 12, 1889. https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/newspaper/item/OEGVST23C22XNLZYEPN2EB2YHXZPABSY?issuepage=3.

Humphries, Mary. Fabric Glossary. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1996. Internet Archive.

Lowes, Emily Leigh. Chats on Old Lace and Needlework. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908. https://archive.org/details/cu31924052083924/page/n115/mode/2up?view=theater.

Queen, The Lady’s Newspaper. “A Royal Trousseau.” May 18, 1889.

Standard (London). “The Greek Royal Wedding. The German Emperor’s Reception.” October 28, 1889.

Princess Sophie of Prussia’s Wedding Ensemble

On October 27, 1889, Princess Sophie of Prussia (1870-1932) married Crown Prince Constantine of Greece (1868-1923), also known as the Duke of Sparta, in Athens. The third daughter of Frederick III, German Emperor (1831-88) and Victoria, Princess Royal of the United Kingdom (1840-1901), the bride was also a granddaughter of Queen Victoria (1819-1901). The bridegroom, the eldest son of King George I of the Hellenes (1845-1913), himself born a Danish prince, and Olga Constantinovna (1851-1926), a Russian grand duchess, was a nephew of Alexandra, Princess of Wales (1844-1925). Consequently, the wedding received much attention from the British press.

The Greeks, too, took a great deal of interest in their Crown Prince’s wedding with a sister of the powerful German Emperor, Wilhelm II (1859-1941), and turned up in droves to welcome him upon his arrival at Piraeus. On the night before the wedding, Emperor Wilhelm and other royal guests were able to see the Acropolis lit up for the occasion from the balcony of the Palace in Athens. Greeks came from all parts of the country to catch a glimpse of the bride, groom and guests, who rode in open carriages to the Cathedral, where the couple were married in a Greek Orthodox ceremony. The wedding procession drew a crowd of about a hundred and fifty thousand—more than twice the population of Athens—dressed in a variety of local costumes that represented the different regions of Greece.1

Despite the auspicious start to her married life, political uncertainty in Greece led Crown Princess Sophia, as Sophie was now known, and her husband to twice take refuge in Prussia. Constantine and Sophia ascended the throne with the assassination of George I in 1913; the onset of World War I generated further crises and eventually, in 1917, the King and his family were forced to leave Greece. Constantine was reinstated in 1920, but a revolt by the Greek army resulted in his abdication in 1922. The royal couple then spent the remainder of their lives in Italy.

Given that Sophia was a controversial figure in her adopted country and abroad—she was thought to have collaborated with her brother the German Emperor, a staunch ally of the Ottoman empire—who spent much of her life after 1917 in exile, it is unsurprising that her wardrobe has seemingly vanished into oblivion. After all, political turmoil and a bad public image are not conducive to the preservation of royal clothing, although there is a possibility that some of Sophia’s clothes do exist in public or private collections, their association with the former Queen of the Hellenes forgotten with the passage of time. Fortunately, thanks to the British newspapers that covered her 1889 nuptials, one can learn much about her wedding dress and trousseau.

Figure 1.1. Artist unknown, The Marriage of the Crown Prince of Greece and the Princess Sophie of Prussia—The Wedding Ceremony in the Cathedral at Athens, Graphic (London), November 9, 1889, 568, source: Newspapers.com. Prince George of Greece and Prince Albert Victor of Wales hold gold crowns over the heads of the bridegroom and the bride, respectively.

Articles kept the English public apprised of the latest developments regarding the bridal wardrobe in the weeks and months leading up to the wedding. On October 5, 1889, the Daily News announced the completion of Princess Sophie’s wedding veil, a product of the Silesian lace-schools in Slemfeisten, Arnsdorf and Seidorf.2 It was more than three yards long and nearly two yards wide; over two hundred Silesian women had worked on the veil for four months under the direction of a Frau Hoppe and a Frau Weinhold.3 The Daily News adds:

The designs were chosen by the Empress Frederick [the bride’s mother] from those in the Berlin Museum of Industry. Thirty-five figures in the utmost variety of stitch are used in the lace in point Venise and point gaze… The edge of the veil in point gaze is composed of 110 different parts… It is to be shown for money in the Townhall of Schneideberg for a few days, together with the bridal veil made at Hirschberg for Princess Leopold of Prussia.4

Point de gaze was one of the highly prized Brussels laces,5 which originated in a geographical area with a reputation for manufacturing the most exquisite laces. Point de gaze was a needlepoint lace made from the 1850s to the 1930s; it derived its name from its delicate gauze ground, composed of lightly-threaded single buttonhole stitches.6 By the early twentieth century, Brussels lace having a fine woven ground that was open and clear was favoured for royal weddings; the mesh was machine-made, however, as the needlepoint net was no longer made.7

Point de Venise, also made in Belgium, was a derivative of the famous Venetian needlepoint lace produced in Venice between 1650 and 1700.8 While ultra-fine linen thread was used in the making of authentic Venetian lace, such was not the case with point de Venise, which employed coarser thread and also had spaced out stitches, giving it a flattened appearance as opposed to the three-dimensional look of Venetian laces of the seventeenth century.9 The sheer number of the above-mentioned “figures”10 (thirty-five), executed “in the utmost variety of stitch,” which could have been over forty types of buttonhole stitch, used in the fillings of needlepoint laces,11 conveys some notion of the lace-maker’s skill as well as the intricacy and ornateness of the designs on the veil.

Figure 1.2. Photographer unknown, Constantine, Duke of Sparta and Princess Sophie of Prussia on their wedding day, 1889, source: BlogSpot.

A somewhat faded wedding photograph of the crown princely couple (figure 1.2) shows the bride wearing a bodice that has a low neckline and short sleeves and tapers to a V-shape in the front over a skirt that seems to be entirely covered with a layer of opulent lace. A garland of myrtle and orange blossom trails from one shoulder down to the tip of the bodice; the skirt is liberally festooned with lengths of the same decoration, which radiate from the waist. An article published in the Standard the day after the wedding provides a clearer picture of the “robe and train of white satin and Silesian lace”12 that was Princess Sophie’s bridal ensemble:

A tablier of silver brocade, made in Lyons, fastened with rich feather trimming and genuine hand-made Venetian lace, which sets off the silver brilliantly, is inserted in the skirt. On the body this lace decoration is continued as trimming, and surrounds a centre-piece, on which a chaste artistic ornament is embroidered in silver threads and silver cords… The finest thing of all is the round train, more than eleven feet long and nearly five feet broad, the white satin of which is embroidered with a splendid Renaissance tendril-pattern of silver threads and cords in low and high relief.13

It is unlikely that genuine Venetian lace had been tacked onto the “tablier”14 or front of the skirt of Sophie’s gown. In all probability the lace in question was point de Venise, which had also been incorporated into her veil and resembled the laces of the seventeenth-century Venetian Republic, but lacked the raised outlines of the latter and was therefore considered inferior in terms of quality and calibre.15 Like the veil, the so-called Venetian lace was of Silesian manufacture and was a conscious attempt on the bride’s part to promote the Prussian lace industry. No feather trimming of any kind is visible in the photograph of the wedding gown, which also fails to reveal the modest, “chaste”16 silver-embroidered bodice decoration alluded to in the above excerpt.

The motifs of the bodice’s understated silver embroidery may have echoed to some extent the “splendid Renaissance tendril-pattern,” also in silver threads, that adorned the impressively long train, carried aloft by three maids of honour during the marriage ceremony.17 Nonetheless, it is next to impossible to imagine what the embroidered design on either the bodice or the train looked like, beyond the fact that a pattern of tendrils would have taken a vegetal form. Similarly, one cannot gauge from the Standard’s vague description what designs were embedded in the skirt’s brocaded fabric and its lace overlay. Perhaps an exhibition of Sophie’s wedding gown would have caused more detailed accounts of its appearance to surface in newspapers of the time. However, the brief news item in the Daily News regarding her veil, which was put up for public display, also omitted any mention of the motifs used or whether these included coats-of-arms, which often appeared on the veils of royal brides.

Stay tuned for my next post, which will be an examination of what contemporary newspapers tell about Princess Sophie’s trousseau.

Notes

1. “The Greek Royal Wedding. The German Emperor’s Reception,” Standard (London), October 28, 1889.

2. “A Wedding Veil,” Daily News (London), October 5, 1889. “Schesien,” miss-spelled in the article as “Schlesian,” is the German name for Silesia, which was a Prussian province at the time (“Silesia,” Wikipedia, last modified January 15, 2024, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silesia).

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. Emily Leigh Lowes, Chats on Old Lace and Needlework (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908), 108, https://archive.org/details/cu31924052083924/page/n115/mode/2up?view=theater.

6. Pat Earnshaw, A Dictionary of Lace (Princes Risborough: Shire Publications, 1982), 131, Internet Archive. “Ground” refers to the “background of the lace linking and displaying the more solid parts of the design” (76). Lowes, Chats on Old Lace, clarifies that needlepoint lace “is made with needle and thread and principally in buttonhole stitches” (49). Pat Earnshaw, Needle-made Laces: Materials, Designs, Techniques (London: Ward Lock, 1988), Internet Archive, describes a buttonhole stitch as having “a looped edge made by taking the thread from the previous stitch around the back of the needle so that the new thread passes over is as it is pulled through. The buttonhole stitch of embroidery and lace is similar to blanket stitch but different from the tailor’s or dressmaking buttonhole stitch” (137).

7. Lowes, Chats on Old Lace, 111, 123-124.

8. Earnshaw, Needle-made Laces, 44.

9. Ibid., 44, 46, 49-50.

10. The Oxford English Dictionary supplies a definition of “figure” that is both illuminating and relevant in this context: “An arrangement of lines, shapes, markings, etc., producing a striking or decorative pattern or design; esp. (on a manufactured article such as a textile) a combination of such designs forming a larger or more complex pattern; (occasionally also) such patterns collectively.”

11. Earnshaw, Needle-made Laces, 45. Earnshaw, Dictionary of Lace, explains that fillings, also known as “à jours,” “ajours,” “jours” and “modes,” were stitches that filled “the enclosed cavity of a lace shape representing flowers, fruit, people or animals” and were “essentially ornamental and varied” (61-62), while Lowes, Chats on Old Lace, adds: “By these fillings various laces may often be distinguished, as each factory had its favourite ‘modes'” (41).

12. “Greek Royal Wedding.”

13. Ibid.

14. “Originally: a part of a dress resembling an apron; a skirt front having the form of an apron. Now: an apron” (Oxford English Dictionary).

15. Earnshaw, Needle-made Laces, 49-50. There were other copies of Venetian lace besides point de Venise that were available during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, such as Burano lace and point Colbert, as well as needle laces made in Ireland (44).

16. “Chaste,” as used in the report in the Standard, means: “Pure in artistic or literary style; without meretricious ornament; chastened, subdued” (Oxford English Dictionary).

17. “The Royal Wedding at Athens. A Great Function,” Derby Mercury, October 30, 1889.

Bibliography

Daily News (London). “A Wedding Veil.” October 5, 1889.

Earnshaw, Pat. A Dictionary of Lace. Princes Risborough: Shire Publications, 1982. Internet Archive.

———. Needle-made Laces: Materials, Designs, Techniques. London: Ward Lock, 1988. Internet Archive.

Lowes, Emily Leigh. Chats on Old Lace and Needlework. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1908. https://archive.org/details/cu31924052083924/page/n115/mode/2up?view=theater.

Standard (London). “The Greek Royal Wedding. The German Emperor’s Reception.” October 28, 1889.

A 1937 Auction of Queen Alexandra’s Clothing (Part II)

Picking up from where Part I left off, this segment covers lots 31 to 70 of the 1937 auction of the clothing of Queen Alexandra of the United Kingdom (1844-1925). As before, I have highlighted items I have not been able to find in any collection, in yellow:

31. EMBROIDERED YELLOW SATIN AND HELIOTROPE STATE GOWN
Pale amber yellow satin embroidered with silver sequins and design of iris in appliqué silks painted heliotrope and pale green, outlined with crystal bugles; taffeta lining with chiffon flounce at hem. Bell-shaped separate skirt with train; pointed bodice with V-neck and tulle scarf sleeves. Worn during the Coronation year, 1902.

This veritable beauty of a gown is now part of the Royal Ontario Museum’s collection (figure 1.7):

32. SHELL PINK WOOL DRIVING COAT
Heavy shell pink woolen coat, trimmed with pink braid, the edges trimmed with lappets. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

Queen Alexandra would have worn such a coat to keep her warm and snug while riding in her carriage; unfortunately, its current whereabouts are unknown.

33. EMBROIDERED GOLD TULLE STATE GOWN WITH TISSUE FLOWERS
In one piece, with train and scarf sleeves; of pale yellow tulle appliqué embroidered with gold tissue flowers, tissue bands under tulle, and gold sequins and bugles; pale yellow satin and chiffon foundations. Worn at Buckingham Palace in 1907, on the occasion of the State visit of royalty, during the Kaiser’s visit in November, 1907, on the King’s birthday; among the guests were the Princess Royal, Duke of  Connaught, Queen of Norway, the German Emperor, Prince of Wales, Princess of Wales, Princess Patricia, Princess Victoria, Prince Johann of Saxony, Prince Olaf, Grand Duchess Vladimir, and the Queen of Portugal.

33. Embroidered gold tulle state gown with tissue flowers [catalogue photo].

The dress now resides at the Met, as golden-looking and glorious as ever (figure 1.8):

34. ROYAL BLUE SEQUIN AND TULLE GOWN
Embroidered with blue sequins and bugles on navy blue tulle with floral design; blue chiffon and black taffeta underdress.  Separate skirt with train, and low-cut bodice overlapping in the front, with long scarf sleeves. Worn during the Coronation year; a favorite gown of Her Majesty’s, worn on many fashionable occasions, also for H. M. the King’s birthday.

Unfortunately, this is a gown that has yet to resurface since the 1937 auction.

35. BLACK AND GOLD SILK COAT
Black and gold silk woven in stripes with a plain gold panel in back; cut with high neck and bell sleeves; trimmed with gold frogs and claw buttons, and fringe. Yellow taffeta lining. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

This is yet another of the coats from Queen Alexandra’s trousseau that awaits discovery.

36. EMBROIDERED WHITE SATIN STATE GOWN
Of white satin, back and front panels with appliqué borders of rose tissue covered with embroidered tulle bearing floral rinceaux in gold cordonnets and bugles. In one piece, with short rose tissue sleeves and square -cut neck. Worn by H. M. the Queen in Portugal (1904) on a visit to the King and Queen of Portugal; also worn for State visits and at the Grand Opera, Lisbon.

Yet another gown that is missing.

37. MAUVE SEQUIN AND TULLE GOWN
Of solid sequin embroidery with ribbon and bowknot motives in deeper mauve; chiffon and taffeta underskirts, with pleated flounces at hem; bodice with square-cut neck and puffed sleeves with lace flounce. Worn by H. M. the Queen during the Coronation year. 1902.

This sparkling princess-line gown in the Met’s online database corresponds with the description in the catalogue (see figure 1.9):

38. SILVER AND GOLD-EMBROIDERED BLACK TULLE STATE GOWN
Black tulle appliqué-embroidered with an allover design of curling silver floral branches, the blossoms heightened with gold; black satin foundation. Separate bell-form skirt with train, hem with tulle flounces; two printed bodices with puffed sleeves of tulle pique with sequins. Together with long detachable state train with similar embroidered border and tulle ruching. The gown and train were embroidered especially for H. M. Queen Alexandra by the wives of all the ruling princes of India, made up in Paris, and presented to her on her becoming Queen of England; worn for one of the Courts held after the Coronation, April 25, 1904. The Orders worn were the Order of the Garter, the Victoria and Albert, the Crown of India, St. John of Jerusalem, and the Danish Family Order.

38. Silver and gold-embroidered black tulle state gown [catalogue photo].

The Met’s photographs of the black four-piece court gown in lot 38 of the auction show it both with and without its detachable train, as well as the two bodices (see figure 1.10):

40. SILVER-EMBROIDERED WHITE SATIN STATE GOWN
Richly embroidered with silver sequins and bugles, paste, and metal thread, with bands of flowers; separate bell-form skirt with train, printed bodice with white tulle scarf sleeves and décolletage. Worn by H. M. Queen during the Court held at Dublin Castle, July, 1903.

Yet another beautiful gown, if the above description is anything to go by, but unfortunately one that has been lost to the general public since 1937.

41. ROSE-PINK VELVET ROBE
Cut with full skirt and train, and long cape; trimmed with silver buttons and narrow galloon of silver sequins. Worn by H. M. the Queen at the wedding of the Grand Duchess Xenia, daughter of Czar Alexander III, to H.R.H. the Duke of Edinburgh, at Peterhof Palace.

This is a rather puzzling entry, considering that her brother-in-law Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh (1844-1900), married Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia (1853-1920), daughter of Tsar Alexander II, in 1874, not Grand Duchess Xenia Alexandrovna (1875-1960), who was Queen Alexandra’s own niece and did not marry until 1894! Nonetheless, one can safely assume that Queen Alexandra wore the dress in question to the 1874 wedding (which did take place in Russia), based on the fact that she wore the gown in lot 16 to Xenia’s nuptials (see Part I).

Although the “rose-pink velvet robe” currently remains unaccounted for, one can imagine what it would have looked like, thanks to Nicholas Chevalier’s (1828-1902) detailed study of the dress (figure 1.11), as well as his painting of the 1874 wedding ceremony (see figure 1.12). In the handwritten notes accompanying the study, Chevalier draws the viewer’s attention to the silver brocade silk of the skirt and the rose velvet of the overskirt (which would have lengthened itself into a court train), embellished with silver-embroidered roses, shamrocks and thistles.

Figure 1.11. Nicholas Chevalier, A Study of the Dress Worn by the Princess of Wales for the Marriage of the Grand Duchess Maria to Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh, January 23, 1874, pencil, watercolour, bodycolour and silver paint with scraping out, 25 x 19 cm, Royal Collection Trust, RCIN 926235, source: RCT.
Figure 1.12. Detail showing Princess Alexandra of Wales (centre, flanked by Crown Princess Victoria of Prussia and Grand Duchess Maria Fyodorovna of Russia) at the Duke of Edinburgh’s wedding. Nicholas Chevalier, The Marriage of Prince Alfred, Duke of Edinburgh, 23 January 1874, 1874-75, oil on canvas, 168.4 x 138.5 cm, Royal Collection Trust, RCIN 404476, source: RCT.

42. SILVER-EMBROIDERED LIGHT GRAY WOOL CAPE
Of pale gray cloth with upstanding collar, with Turkish embroidery in silver; blue sateen lining. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

Another item from Queen Alexandra’s trousseau that has not been seen since the 1937 sale.

43. GOLD AND SILVER EMBROIDERED WHITE TULLE STATE GOWN
White tulle embroidered in gold and silver sequins and bugles and with festoons of delicate opalescent gold flowers; fastening in front with a narrow plain panel of white chiffon; short sleeves, square-cut neck. With train. Worn at Buckingham Palace for State visits.

The whereabouts of this gown are also unknown.

44. BLACK CHIFFON AND BLUE AND SILVER SEQUIN GOWN
Of black chiffon overlaying light blue chiffon on a black satin foundation; embroidered in blue and silver sequins with a large shaded floral design. Separate bell-shaped skirt with train; two bodices, one with short sleeves trimmed with black lace, the other décolleté with short black tulle sleeves. Worn at Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle.

This three-piece gown is missing as well.

45. DANISH WHITE WOOL AND LAMB DRIVING COAT
With wide borders and deep collar of white lamb; trimmed with gold braid and frogs, lined in light yellow taffeta. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

Pictures of this driving coat, now part of the Met’s costume collection, can be seen in figure 1.13:

46. EMBROIDERED BLACK TULLE GOWN
With heavy chain-stitch and appliqué velvet embroidery in black; satin underskirt. In one piece, with train, square-cut bodice and puffed sleeves. Said to have been H. M. the Queen’s favorite dinner gown, worn at Christmas and Easter at Sandringham.

Lot 46 was the last of Queen Alexandra’s gowns on offer and like so many of the others in this auction, there has been no sign of it since it was sold.

54. CORAL SATIN AND LACE APRON
Composed of satin lappets with ruching and écru lace borders. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

In November 2020, this so-called apron featured in an auction of Hollywood memorabilia. Even more unbelievably, the auctioneer, Profiles in History, referred to the item as a collar and even presented it as such on a mannequin (see figure 1.14). Nevertheless, the lot description provides a fuller picture of the object’s provenance by supplying the inscription on the internal bias label: “1902 P-A-I. Worn by H. M. Queen Alexandra. Part of her trousseau. Purchased through Samuel Wilson Soden – May 5 – 1937 Traphagen School.”1 In all likelihood, an inventory of Queen Alexandra’s former wardrobe as Princess of Wales was carried out in 1902, the year of her coronation, and so it is plausible that “P-A-I” stands for “Princess Alexandra Inventory.” New York’s Traphagen School of Fashion, which existed between 1923 and 1991 and trained well-known American designers,2 bought the “collar” at the 1937 auction, as indicated by the garment’s label, and most likely added it to its study collection.

Costume historian Kate Strasdin has pointed out that the garment, which is now in a private collection, is not a collar, cape or apron, but rather a peplum that would have been worn over an 1860s skirt.3

Figure 1.14. Profiles in History, “The Icons and Legends of Hollywood (Day 1): November 13, 2020,” lot 1, source: LiveAuctioneers.

It is disappointing that even now, decades later, with fashion researchers, historians and collectors on the hunt for Queen Alexandra’s clothing, so many pieces from the 1937 sale have yet to turn up. Feel free to write back if you know where any of them may be located.

Notes

1. “Queen Alexandra of Denmark Satin and Lace Collar. – Nov 12, 2020 | Profiles in History in CA,” LiveAuctioneers, accessed January 10, 2024, https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/91727606_queen-alexandra-of-denmark-satin-and-lace-collar.

2. “The Traphagen School: Fostering American Fashion | Fashion Institute of Technology,” The Museum at FIT, accessed January 10, 2024, https://www.fitnyc.edu/museum/exhibitions/traphagen-school.php.

3. Kate Strasdin, December 28, 2023, comment on Faiza Mahmud, “A 1937 Auction of Queen Alexandra’s Clothing (Part I),” Lost and Found (blog), January 29, 2022, https://dressingroyalty.wordpress.com/2022/01/29/a-1937-auction-of-queen-alexandras-clothing-part-i/; Dr Kate Strasdin (@kateStrasdin), “This is a curiosity. Selling at auction @pihauctions next month & belonging to Alexandra, #PrincessofWales, it was originally sold at a famous auction,” Twitter, October 29, 2020, 2:29 p.m., https://twitter.com/kateStrasdin/status/1321745851459522560. Pointing out that the word “peplum” first came into use in 1866, the Oxford English Dictionary defines it as, “The part of a woman’s jacket or tunic which hangs below the waist; a jacket or tunic having such a design,” before going on to describe it as “†a kind of overskirt resembling the ancient peplos (obsolete).” This latter, now defunct, definition seems to apply in this context.

Bibliography

American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, Inc. Royal Robes and State Gowns, Including Toilettes Worn at the Coronation and from the Trousseau of H. M. Queen Alexandra, Comprising Coats, Kashmir Shawls, Bags, Gloves and Embroidered Slippers, with Other Examples of the Richest Fashions of the Period from 1863 to 1907: Auction in New York, May 5, 1937. New York: American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, 1937. https://archive.org/details/royalrobesstateg00amer/page/n3/mode/2up.

A 1937 Auction of Queen Alexandra’s Clothing (Part I)

All the garments now in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York that once belonged to Queen Alexandra (1844-1925), consort of King Edward VII of the United Kingdom (1841-1910), came from a landmark auction comprising seventy lots of her clothing and other effects. Intriguingly, this sale also took place in New York, at the American Art Association Anderson Galleries, Inc., located on 30 East 57th Street, in all probability because there were no laws at the time that prevented items of historical value from leaving their country of origin. At the time of the auction, Samuel Wilson Soden, Esq., a court furrier with a shop on Regent Street in London, owned the items, whose sale was conducted according to his instructions on May 5, 1937.1

Below, I have provided a colour image for each of the items that I have been able to find on the Met’s website, with a lot of guidance from Victoriana Magazine’s annotations in the auction catalogue itself.2 I have decided to focus on apparel only, such as gowns, coats, and mantles, because these have historic value or were connected to major events in Queen Alexandra’s life. Therefore, I have paid special attention to clothes from her trousseau (she married in 1863), as well as gowns she wore as a Princess of Wales and later as a Queen consort who was very much in the public eye.

The various lots that made their way into the Met’s collection either have “Gift of Miss Irene Lewisohn, 1937” or “Rogers Fund, 1937” in the credit line. The Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto has a small collection of gowns from the auction, all of which were donated by Colonel Flanagan, a collector.3 However, the rest appear to have mostly vanished without a trace—if you have a clue regarding their whereabouts, please leave a comment.

Identifying the pieces is hard work and requires a lot of guesswork, partly because the 1937 catalogue suffers from a paucity of photographs and incomplete or scanty descriptions (it omits names of designers). Descriptions from the catalogue are in italics (mine) and are numbered from 1 to 30. I have also highlighted items I could not find in yellow:

10. INDIAN WHITE AND GOLD BROCADE GOWN
Of damasse white silk brocaded with gold rosettes and borders; separate skirt in two pieces, the front panel with wide gold border at hem, the back forming a train. Coat-like bodice fastened in front, with long sleeves, high neck, lace jabot and collar. Worn by H. M. Queen Alexandra on the occasion of Queen Victoria’s Jubilee, when Her Majesty rode around London with Queen Victoria; woven especially for Her Majesty for that occasion and brought over by Viscount Hardinge; also worn at Ascot on Gold Cup Day.

10. Indian white and gold brocade gown [catalogue photo].

Where did it go?

16. GOLD EMBROIDERED WHITE SATIN GOWN
White satin embroidered in gold thread, gold sequins, and rhinestones, with an Empire design of laurel leaves in garlands and wreaths. In one piece, bodice with short bolero and short puffed sleeves trimmed with white tulle. With train. Worn by H. M. the Queen at the wedding of Grand Duchess Xenia, daughter of Czar Alexander III, at Peterhof Palace.

16. Gold embroidered white satin gown [catalogue photo].

I am fairly certain that the Royal Ontario Museum is the proud owner of the “gold embroidered white satin gown” these days, but I cannot prove this with a photograph, since its online database lists only a limited number of garments from its collection, none of which belonged to Queen Alexandra.

17. EMBROIDERED WHITE SILK COAT AND SCARLET BASHLIK
White faille silk coat, beaded and fringed; and scarlet bashlik with gold embroidery.

A white silk coat by Dieulefait & E. Bouclier that entered the Met’s collection in 1937 (see figure 1.1) closely matches the above description:

Figure 1.1. Dieulefait & E. Bouclier (French), Coat, late 19th-early 20th century, silk, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, C.I.37.44.5, source: The Met.

Figure 1.2 shows images of the gold-embroidered scarlet bashlik:

20. WHITE SILK AND LACE WRAP
Short mantle of white faille silk with insertions and vandyked borders of guipure lace; trimmed with silk cording at the neck. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

Pictures of Queen Alexandra’s dainty and feminine-looking lace wrap can be seen in figure 1.3:

21. GOLD AND SILVER-EMBROIDERED BLUE TULLE GOWN
Light blue tulle embroidered in gold and silver beads with floral dies and broad bands at the top and hem; on blue satin foundation. Tight swathed bodice with square-cut neck and short sleeves; skirt gathered to the back with short train. Worn at King Edward’s Coronation, 1902.

Sounds lovely, doesn’t it? Blue must have been a pleasant change from Queen Alexandra’s usual colour choices at the time (i.e., black and purple, the colours of full- and half-mourning, respectively, which she favoured after the death of her son, Prince Albert Victor, in 1892). But where is it now? Unfortunately, the auction catalogue’s lack of a photograph adds to the challenge of finding the gown.

25. BLACK SEQUIN AND TULLE STATE GOWN
Embroidered with allover design and radiating stripes in sequins; black taffeta foundation, with pleated tulle flounces at hem. Separate bell-form skirt with train; three bodices, one with short sleeves of ball fringe, two with long sleeves and high necks, trimmed with ecru lace. Worn by H. M. the Queen for the State Opening of Parliament on several occasions; worn with the Garter Robe Orders, the Victoria and Albert, the Crown of India, the St. Catherine of Russia, and the Danish Royal Family Orders.

Unfortunately, this four-piece garment also seems to have disappeared and again, a photograph in the catalogue might have helped with its identification.

26. GOLD-TRIMMED BLACK WOOL COATEE
Sleeveless jacket of black wool trimmed with voltes and bands of gold braid. Part of H. M. Queen Alexandra’s trousseau.

The coatee in question was sold by Austin Auction Gallery in early 2021 (see figure 1.4). The auctioneer states that this piece was “purchased by Miss Gladys Emerson Cook (American, costume designer, active in New York City, 1899-1976) at the May 5, 1937 sale at the American Art Association Anderson Galleries in New York City, billed as an ‘unique assemblage of royal robes and state gowns, formerly belonging to H.M. Queen Alexandra, including toilettes worn at her coronation and from her trousseau.'”4 There is no doubt that this is the same coatee, as the auctioneer identifies it as lot 26 in the 1937 catalogue.

27. SCOTTISH TARTAN AND WHITE SATIN CRINOLINE BALL DRESS
Plaid satin panniers in the Royal Stuart tartan over a separate skirt of white satin ruffles outlined in red, with internal stiffening. Pointed bodice with pleated bertha trimmed with black lace, and short white tulle sleeves. With belt and separate collar. Worn at the Scottish Balls at Balmoral when H. M. the Queen first came to England.

27. Scottish tartan and white satin crinoline ball dress [catalogue photo].

The above dress, made by Madame Elise, a London dressmaking establishment, in 1863 or so, currently resides at the Royal Ontario Museum under the accession number 942.12.1.A-E. Madame Elise also created for Alexandra a tartan-printed evening gown that dates to about 1870 and is in the collection of the Fashion Museum, Bath.

29. MAUVE CHIFFON AND PURPLE SEQUIN GOWN
Black tulle embroidered all over with graduated purple sequins, mauve chiffon underdress, on a satin foundation; separate bell-shaped skirt with train, pointed bodice with square-cut neck and collar and short bell sleeves. Worn by H. M. Queen Alexandra during the Coronation year, 1902.

A gown in the Met’s collection database (figure 1.5) seems to answer to the above description:

Figure 1.5. Maker unknown (French), Evening dress, 1902, silk, sequins, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, C.I.37.44.2a, b, source: Pinterest.

30. EMBROIDERED BLACK VELVET RIDING COAT AND HAT
Coat with flared skirt and three-quarter puffed sleeves, high lace collar, jabot, and cuffs; embroidered in gold and appliqué silks with floral borders and mock pockets. Black velvet hat trimmed with pink and black ostrich plumes. (Lot.)

The eighteenth-century inspired riding ensemble described above now resides in the Met’s collection (see figure 1.6):

In Part II, I will cover lots 31 to 70 of the auction. Stay tuned!

Notes

1. American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, Inc., Royal Robes and State Gowns, Including Toilettes Worn at the Coronation and from the Trousseau of H. M. Queen Alexandra, Comprising Coats, Kashmir Shawls, Bags, Gloves and Embroidered Slippers, with Other Examples of the Richest Fashions of the Period from 1863 to 1907: Auction in New York, May 5, 1937 (New York: American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, 1937), https://archive.org/details/royalrobesstateg00amer/page/n3/mode/2up; Kate Strasdin, Inside the Royal Wardrobe: A Dress History of Queen Alexandra (London: Bloomsbury, 2017), chap. 9, Kindle.

2. “Victorian Clothing | Auctioning a Queen’s Wardrobe,” Victoriana Magazine, accessed January 13, 2024, http://www.victoriana.com/library/queen.html.

3. Strasdin, Inside the Royal Wardrobe, chap. 9.

4. “H.M. Queen Alexandra Gold Braid Wool Coatee – Jan 17, 2021 | Austin Auction Gallery in TX,” LiveAuctioneers, accessed January 5, 2024, https://www.liveauctioneers.com/item/95229522_hm-queen-alexandra-gold-braid-wool-coatee.

Bibliography

American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, Inc. Royal Robes and State Gowns, Including Toilettes Worn at the Coronation and from the Trousseau of H. M. Queen Alexandra, Comprising Coats, Kashmir Shawls, Bags, Gloves and Embroidered Slippers, with Other Examples of the Richest Fashions of the Period from 1863 to 1907: Auction in New York, May 5, 1937. New York: American Art Association-Anderson Galleries, 1937. https://archive.org/details/royalrobesstateg00amer/page/n3/mode/2up.

Strasdin, Kate. Inside the Royal Wardrobe: A Dress History of Queen Alexandra. London: Bloomsbury, 2017. Kindle.